Affiliate Disclosure: Some links on this page earn us a commission. Our editorial judgments are independent.

Is CrushOn AI Safe? What You Should Know Before Subscribing

The answer depends on what you mean by "safe." Safe from fraud, scams, or credential theft — yes. Safe in the sense that your intimate conversations are protected with strong privacy guarantees — more nuanced. This page gives you the specific facts: company legitimacy, technical security status, what the Mozilla privacy warning actually means, and practical steps to minimize exposure as a user.

Company Background Check

Operator: Peekaboo Tech Inc.

Headquarters: San Francisco, California

Founded: 2023

Legal status: US-incorporated company

Funding: $15 million from venture capital investors

Revenue: Approximately $18 million annual (reported)

User base: 5 million registered, 3 million monthly active users

Peekaboo Tech Inc. is a verifiably real, commercially active US company. It is not anonymous, not offshore, and not operating under false pretenses. The business model is subscription-based: they make money from what users pay monthly, not from data sales.

Technical Security

In-transit encryption: SSL/TLS implemented sitewide. Data transmitted between your device and CrushOn AI servers is encrypted during transit. This is verified and standard for reputable commercial platforms.

At-rest encryption: Conversations stored on company servers are not end-to-end encrypted. The company has technical access to stored conversation data. This is the standard position for consumer AI chat platforms industry-wide — it is not a unique CrushOn AI vulnerability, but it is the key limitation for privacy-critical users.

Security incidents: No publicly reported data breaches involving CrushOn AI as of May 2026.

Payment security: Payment processing is handled by third-party processors (Subscribestar, Apple App Store, Google Play). CrushOn AI does not directly store payment card details.

The Mozilla Warning: What It Actually Means

Mozilla Foundation's Privacy Not Included project reviewed CrushOn AI and issued a "Warning" designation — the middle tier on their three-level scale (below their most severe "Danger" rating, above a clean "OK").

The Mozilla rating is based on privacy policy analysis, not security testing. The specific concerns Mozilla flagged:

• Privacy policy authorizes broad data collection scope
• Potential for conversation data to be used for AI model training improvements
• Self-reported age verification only (18+ checkbox)

This is a policy flag, not an incident report. Mozilla is documenting that CrushOn AI's policies permit more than their guidelines prefer. It does not mean CrushOn AI has been caught misusing data — it means the policy language gives the company wide latitude.

For users who need a platform with minimal data collection rights, the Mozilla label is a meaningful signal. For typical consumer entertainment users, the practical day-to-day difference between "Warning" and "OK" is small.

What Data CrushOn AI Holds About You

From their published privacy policy (reviewed May 2026):

Account data: Email, username, hashed password

Conversations: Stored server-side, not E2E encrypted, accessible to the company

Usage patterns: Sessions, characters interacted with, feature use frequency

Device info: Device type, OS, browser

IP address: Used for approximate location inference

Payment context: Transaction records (not card details — those stay with processors)

What they do not collect: Government ID, biometrics, direct bank account information

The company states it does not sell user data to third parties. Their subscription revenue model supports this claim — they do not need data sales to monetize.

The Age Verification Problem: Specific and Acknowledged

CrushOn AI requires users to confirm they are 18+ via a checkbox. No document verification, no payment card age inference, no technical barrier to underage access beyond the acknowledgment step.

This is an explicitly documented limitation of the platform. It is not a hidden problem — it is visible to anyone who creates an account. The platform does not claim otherwise.

Parents: checkbox age gates are not protection. OS-level parental controls and router-level content filtering are the effective tools for preventing access.

Who Is at Risk, and How Much

Risk is low for: Adult users who register with a secondary email, share no personal information in conversations, and are comfortable with standard consumer platform data practices. The practical exposure is similar to using any social or entertainment app.

Risk is elevated for: Users who share real names, addresses, workplace information, or other identifying personal details in conversations. That content exists on company servers indefinitely under current policy.

Risk is too high for: Journalists, people in legally or personally sensitive situations, anyone for whom conversation content could have professional or legal consequences. No commercial AI chat platform without E2E encryption is appropriate for this use case.

Risk is clear for minors: The age gate is meaningless technically. Effective parental controls are device and network level.

Protecting Yourself If You Use CrushOn AI

1. Secondary email — not linked to your real name, work, or other accounts
2. Username not tied to other platforms
3. Share zero personally identifying information in conversations
4. Periodically delete conversations you no longer need
5. When done permanently: submit a formal account deletion request, specifically a GDPR or CCPA request if eligible — these carry legal weight for data removal

See our account deletion guide for the full process.

Bottom Line

CrushOn AI is safe in the sense that it is a legitimate company with standard commercial security. It carries documented privacy limitations — stored conversations without E2E encryption, Mozilla "Warning" data policy, no real age verification. For typical adult users who apply basic privacy hygiene, the platform is functionally comparable in risk profile to standard consumer entertainment services.

For privacy-sensitive use cases, it is not the right choice.

See our full CrushOn AI review for complete platform assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions